propecia kaufen

 13 Apr 2015 @ 1:57 PM 

Just now I’ve had the privileged to be part of a discussion about knowledge of PowerShell, recruiters and employers.
The argument was made that some employers expect an admin or expert to know PowerShell.
So far, so good.

Realistic expectations
But, they expect an IT Pro’s to know all verbs, nouns and/or cmdlets… or at least those of a specific technology (i.e. Exchange or Lync).
So, dear recruiters and employers: Are you nuts!!!???
Would you as a layer to recite the entire law? Or an accountant to name and explain all tax rules and regulations?
Naturally, they would not be allowed to look it up in a book or on the internet.
Because that’s what you’re expecting from the admin/expert you’re interviewing…

PowerShell is created in a way where it teaches you to gain the information you need as you go.
It is discoverable… the same why a law book has a table of contents or an index.

So when you interview an admin/expert, ask about how he would explore and gain the information, not about the information itself.
There are two gotchas here though…

1) An AD admin that doesn’t know about the Get-ADUser cmdlet isn’t suited for his job these days.
2) Some customers ask me to sit next to an technology experts (i.e. Lync) and with his knowledge of the product (which I do not have), I can script whatever they want to get scripted.

Define what you need and what you want
I’ve seen so many job positions where they ask for a whole list of required knowledge… i.e. Hyper-V, System Center, Exchange, Office365, Azure, Storage and Networking, VMWare and AD.
Well, good luck finding a single person that’s an expert in all of those 😉
Because this is the IT version of looking for someone that is the is the IT admin, does the financial administration, marketing, reception and sales… all at an expert level.

Don’t think in people, think in teams and tasks.
When you hire people, you’ll end up with a team. Spread the required knowledge over the entire team, where one is none. So each expertise should be delegated to at least two people.
So you need two experts for each technology? No!
You need (at least) one expert, let’s name that the Product Owner. He/she decides the direction of the solution within the company.
In the absence of that Product Owner, the secondary guy/girl comes into play. He/she knows what the Product Owner wants and can answer questions colleagues may have.
Though, they do not hold any responsibilities about the solution itself… only for their own actions (when they fix something that broke, and break it even further).

So what is the point of this all?
When you, as a company, look at a team the question becomes: What skills am I missing within that team?
Define what you’re missing, which are the ‘what you need’ criteria.
So what skills do you have within the team, but only with one person?
That’s the ‘what you want’ criteria.
Anything else which is considered technical is secondary and should not be placed in the job description.

Written by HR
So many times I’ve read about a job position where the description was clearly written by a non-technical person.
I’ve actually had a phone call from a recruiter asking ‘You are an MVP in PowerShell, so you are good at making presentations?’.
These days I just skip those job positions all together.
If you don’t invest the time in the description, what am I to expect from an actual interview?!

The interview
During most interviews I’ve had at least one tech person sitting in, there are the rare exceptions where there isn’t.
A manager, team-leader or HR lady with no technical knowledge whatsoever had to interview me for a (deeply) technical job.
Though I always remain polite, I have to say that those people tend to make a fool out of themselves without even knowing it.
Yes, I like to tease people. That’s just the way I am.
But in these situations, all I have to do it sit back and watch it happen. No efforts is required from my side whatsoever…
For example: A technical person would never ask another one to name all cmdlets for a product 😉

A request to…
All companies: Either get a tech person sit in for technical questions (ask and receive) or don’t even try to ask technical stuff.
The moment you’ll start mis-using terminology or are asked a question in return, you’ll just make a fool out of yourself.
And let’s be honest, you’re not a fool… so why seem like one?

All recruiters: Do your homework. I’m not talking about the fact that some recruiters contact me about an App-V sequencing job because the term ‘scripting’ in used on my LinkedIn and resume.
Although that also leaves room for improvement.
I am talking about the fact that some of you don’t even have read the resume of the person sitting in front of you!
Next to the fact that I find it rather offensive, it is unprofessional.
Again, let’s be honest… you’re not, right? 😉

Posted By: Jeff Wouters
Last Edit: 13 Apr 2015 @ 01:57 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (2)
Tags
Categories: Rant

 09 Mar 2015 @ 7:38 AM 

Back in 2012 I was interviewed by a company named FeatherNet, which you can find here.

I would like to take a quote from this interview:

I also think that the layering and modularization of all the components of an IT infrastructure 
will cause virtualization to expand in even more directions, such as virtualizing 
services or even entire roles of operating systems.

Last week I read this article which talked about a thing called ‘Nano Server’.
You may also want to take a look at a post from Mary Jo Foley about this, which you can find here.
This got me all excited and I immediately remembered the interview I did… because in a way I was theorizing about this.
But, back then I was limited by the knowledge and experiences I had. I thought that there would be App-V packages for Windows Server roles.
Boy, was I mistaken. Think about it… Microsoft is a vendor. They own the Operating System. So think long term, instead of short.
They can take years to get to a point where they want to be… Now that’s architecture at its best :-)

If you’ve read the article I linked to, and my interview, I would like to theorize again.
Think of a world with a server footprint of only a few 100 megabytes, preferably less.
Because all the binaries for all Windows Server roles aren’t located in the installation itself, but available as a package which you can deploy, you get a deployment time which is a fraction of the time it takes right now. And let’s be honest… if you’ve ever installed Windows Server 10 on a SSD drive through a 1GB WAN or USB3 device, you’ll confirm that it’s pretty darn fast already.
Now think about a fraction of that time… Wow!

Also a great benefit is the separation of code.
Back in the old days, Windows Server was a huge monster… one big bulk of code.
These days it has become more and more modularized.
The logical next step is to take those modules out from the OS and make them stand-alone packages which you can deploy like any other package.

If you’re even a little bit in the thing called DevOps, this should make you smile and bounce on your chair from excitement :-)

Posted By: Jeff Wouters
Last Edit: 09 Mar 2015 @ 07:38 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags





 Last 50 Posts
 Back
Change Theme...
  • Users » 1
  • Posts/Pages » 350
  • Comments » 539
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight

About



    No Child Pages.

Contact



    No Child Pages.

Speaking



    No Child Pages.

Health Check



    No Child Pages.